West Bengal’s political transition offers a strategic opening to replace incremental governance with a bold economic reset focused on industrial renaissance, agro-value integration, fiscal prudence, and urban dynamism
Image Source: Getty Images
A decisive electoral mandate emerged from the West Bengal Assembly polls on 4 May, 2026. The victory of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) ends an era of 49 years of conflictual federalism (a conflicting central–state relationship marked by disputes, contradictions, and ideological tensions) that intensified in recent years under the outgoing dispensation in the state. This political transition in West Bengal needs to translate into a structural economic reset, not merely incremental governance corrections. After decades of policy drift, institutional erosion, and missed industrial opportunities, the new dispensation has the chance to reposition Bengal within India’s growth story. The potential exists, but the alignment has been missing so far, and needs correction.
West Bengal today is India’s sixth-largest state economy, with a projected Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP) of about INR 20.3 lakh crore in 2025–26. Yet, beneath this scale lies a structural imbalance. The services sector accounts for nearly 55 percent of the state’s output, followed by industry at about 24 percent and agriculture at roughly 21 percent. While the economy appears service-driven, a significant share of the workforce remains dependent on agriculture, which contributes barely a fifth of output. The result is a classic case of premature tertiarisation, accompanied by disguised underemployment and stagnant productivity.
Any serious revival must begin with a reaffirmation of the rule of law, transparency in land and regulatory processes, and a depoliticised administrative framework.
Further, one needs to note the classic down-sliding of the state in relative economic terms. During the 1960s–70s, West Bengal consistently ranked around third in per capita Net State Domestic Product (NSDP), with income levels at around 115-125 percent of the national average. The erosion of its standing began in the late 1970s, with erstwhile economic mandates leading to deindustrialisation, economic insulation, slower structural transformation, and weaker investment dynamics than those of the Western and Southern states. Today, West Bengal has slid to the mid-20s (roughly 23rd–28th) in per capita NSDP rankings, with per capita income around 80–85 percent of the national average. This marks sustained organic and inorganic damage to its institutions, polity, culture, and governance. Yet a latent potential remains in its endowment of natural capital, initial conditioning, and connectivity. The task ahead, therefore, may not be entirely about building from scratch, but about realigning the economic architecture.
The first and most fundamental priority is restoring law and order and, consequently, economic governance as credible public goods. Investment flows from predictability, not merely economic incentives. While Bengal continues to attract investment proposals and has witnessed improvements in tax collections and industrial growth in recent years, investor sentiment has often been constrained by concerns around corruption, syndicate raj (an entrenched system of organised extortion and corruption), regulatory uncertainty, and institutional credibility. Any serious revival must begin with a reaffirmation of the rule of law, transparency in land and regulatory processes, and a depoliticised administrative framework. Economic revival in Bengal must begin with the sovereignty of institutional credibility.
Second, the state must engineer an industrial renaissance. Bengal’s industrial decline is well documented — from the erosion of its jute sector and engineering base to missed opportunities in modern manufacturing. Today, industry contributes only about a quarter of the state’s output, well below expectations. But the potential exists: the industrial sector recorded growth of over 7 percent in 2024–25, marginally above the national average. The way forward lies in cluster-based industrialisation, anchored in sectoral strengths such as metals and heavy industry in the western belt, petrochemicals and logistics in Haldia, and MSME-led manufacturing around Kolkata, South and North 24 Parganas, Murshidabad and Nadia, among others. This must be supported by plug-and-play industrial infrastructure, streamlined clearances, and labour flexibility balanced with social protection. Further, the government needs to create production- and export-linked incentive structures for MSMES. A recent ORF paper provides that formula. The shift must be from land politics to land productivity economics.
The priority should be to build integrated agro-processing clusters, expand cold-chain infrastructure, and promote export-oriented agriculture.
Third, agriculture must be reimagined as the foundation of agro-industrial value chains rather than a subsistence sector. Bengal is one of India’s leading agricultural states: the largest producer of rice and vegetables and among the top producers of fish and potatoes. Yet, despite contributing significantly to national output, agriculture generates relatively low incomes due to fragmented value chains and limited processing capacity. Furthermore, there remains immense potential to scale operations. The ceiling provisions on holdings, under the West Bengal Land Reforms Act 1955 (strengthened in the late 1960s–70s), by redistributing surplus land into smaller ownership units, expanded the base of marginal and smallholdings. This, compounded by subsequent subdivision through inheritance, demographic pressure, and thin land-lease markets, led to operational fragmentation and a lack of scale. This has impaired resource-use efficiency and productivity. Scaling operations and market access need to be the responses to this. This will include enabling secure land leasing, strengthening Farmer Producer Organisations (FPOs) for aggregation, and expanding shared services such as machinery banks and irrigation systems. The priority should be to build integrated agro-processing clusters, expand cold-chain infrastructure, and promote export-oriented agriculture. Fisheries and aquaculture, with production exceeding 2 million tonnes annually, offer a particularly high-value pathway. So far, the sheer inefficiency in the value chain has held Bengal’s agricultural sector back; the response mechanism is to address it.
Fourth, urbanisation — especially the Kolkata metropolitan region — must be positioned as the growth engine of the state. While services already dominate the economic structure, Kolkata has not evolved into a globally competitive urban economy. Yet, its economic potential is evident: even a single cultural-economic event like Durga Puja generates an estimated INR 65,000 crore in economic activity annually, with Kolkata accounting for nearly 70 percent of this. A focused strategy is needed to develop Kolkata as a financial, knowledge, and services hub, supported by urban infrastructure financing mechanisms such as municipal bonds and public-private partnerships. Without a globally competitive Kolkata, Bengal cannot become a nationally competitive state economy. Kolkata has largely remained ignored for decades due to the inherent conflictual federalism, and now the time has come for the Centre and state to work together to create a new Committee on Making Kolkata a Growth Force in the BIMSTEC region, much in line with the High-Powered Expert Committee (HPEC) on Making Mumbai an International Financial Centre.
A focused strategy is needed to develop Kolkata as a financial, knowledge, and services hub, supported by urban infrastructure financing mechanisms such as municipal bonds and public-private partnerships. Without a globally competitive Kolkata, Bengal cannot become a nationally competitive state economy.
Fifth, the State must leverage its geoeconomic position as India’s eastern gateway. With exports exceeding INR 1.09 lakh crore annually and proximity to Bangladesh and the Northeast, Bengal is uniquely positioned to anchor a trade- and logistics-led growth strategy. Strengthening port-led development in Haldia and Kolkata, expanding inland waterways, and building multimodal logistics corridors can transform the state into a regional trade hub. Bengal must rediscover its historical identity as a gateway economy.
Sixth, human capital development must underpin this structural transition. The state’s population of nearly 100 million represents both an opportunity and a constraint. While labour availability is high, the skill base remains misaligned with emerging economic opportunities. A targeted approach is needed to develop skill ecosystems linked to industrial clusters, enhance employability aligned with national and global labour markets, and strengthen health and education systems as productivity investments. Human capital remains Bengal’s most underutilised asset. The state’s university system requires significant reform, and the condition and regulatory oversight of private universities warrant deeper examination. A word of caution is also necessary: government transfers, especially those not associated with productive labour, tend to create underemployment. This has been proven to be true for many economies, with unemployment transfers leading to idle labour. Therefore, transfer schemes need to be devised judiciously so as not to cause underemployment; rather, such subsidies should be directed at human capital formation. The perennial problem in Bengal has been the flight of human capital due to a lack of opportunities — a malaise that can only be addressed through industrialisation and growth of associated services.
Seventh, fiscal strategy must shift towards enhancing the quality of public expenditure. While tax revenues have shown steady growth — GST collections, for instance, have risen by double digits in recent periods — the composition of expenditure needs to be recalibrated towards infrastructure and capital formation. West Bengal’s fiscal stress, which has deepened over the past 15 years, reflects a structural imbalance — a legacy debt trap compounded by persistent revenue deficits, low revenue buoyancy, and an expenditure shift towards committed and transfer payments under various populist welfare schemes — at the cost of growth-enhancing investment. Rationalising subsidies and aligning them with productivity-enhancing outcomes can create fiscal space for such investments.
The perennial problem in Bengal has been the flight of human capital due to a lack of opportunities — a malaise that can only be addressed through industrialisation and growth of associated services.
Finally, institutional architecture must move from populism to policy credibility. Single-window clearance systems must function in practice, not merely on paper. Governance must become data-driven, transparent, and accountable. Independent regulatory institutions must be strengthened to build long-term investor confidence. In an increasingly competitive federal landscape, credibility itself becomes a critical economic asset.
The opportunity before the new dispensation is immense and far deeper than a routine change in governance. It is an opportunity to reset West Bengal's development governance paradigm: from stagnation to dynamism, from fragmentation to integration, and from perception-driven decline to performance-driven growth.
Nilanjan Ghosh is Vice President — Development Studies at the Observer Research Foundation.
The views expressed above belong to the author(s). ORF research and analyses now available on Telegram! Click here to access our curated content — blogs, longforms and interviews.
Dr Nilanjan Ghosh heads Development Studies at the Observer Research Foundation (ORF) and serves as the operational and executive head of ORF’s Kolkata Centre. He ...
Read More +
PREV
