Occasional PapersPublished on Dec 02, 2015 PDF Download
ballistic missiles,Defense,Doctrine,North Korea,Nuclear,PLA,SLBM,Submarines

Home Enquiry and the Rehabilitation of Trafficking Survivors

  • Nishtha Gautam
  • Debdatta Dobe

    Human traffcking remains a highly acute issue in India and rehabilitation efforts must be stepped up to make sure that those rescued from these hazardous situations are given a chance to rejoin mainstream society. However, various loopholes exist in the judicial and executive processes involved in the country’s rehabilitation systems. This paper describes such problems evident in the process of home enquiry for the rescued victims: fraught with errors and subject to negligence, the process often leads to unfavourable decisions for rehabilitation. The authors examine these concerns and other recommendations.

Introduction

Human tracking is a multi-billion industry in India, with sex tracking generating roughly $9 billion per annum.1 In 2007, the Ministry of Women and Child Development reported the presence of over three million female sex workers in India, with 35.47 percent of them entering the trade before the age of 18. Prostitution is not the only occupation that child victims of tracking are forced into. Bonded or forced labour, often under hazardous work conditions, entraps a much larger number of Indian children. e 2011 Census pegs the number of working children in the age group of 5-14 years at a massive 4,353,247.2 In addition, around 2.4 million adolescents (14-18 years) are employed in hazardous industries, as identied by the International Labour Organization's (ILO) latest 'World Report on Child Labour'.3

During discussions on the amendment to the Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act of 1986, passed in early 2015, plenty was said about ensuring that children remain away from labour and complete their schooling. However, little attention has been paid to the processes that facilitate the return of the tracked or enslaved children to a life of dignity. is paper attempts to highlight the lacunae in the existing home enquiry process, often leading to depriving the rescued victims of available family or institutionalised support. Also, failure in identifying risk factors within the family puts them in danger of being re-tracked.

The views expressed above belong to the author(s). ORF research and analyses now available on Telegram! Click here to access our curated content — blogs, longforms and interviews.

Authors

Nishtha Gautam

Nishtha Gautam

Nishtha Gautam was Associate Fellow at Observer Research Foundation where she works on gender issues in policy and governance. She holds an MPhil from the ...

Read More +
Debdatta Dobe

Debdatta Dobe

Debdatta Dobe was Legal and Policy Researcher at Justice and Care, an international anti-trafficking organisation. She holds an LLM degree from Harvard Law School. Her ...

Read More +

Contributors

Nishtha Gautam

Nishtha Gautam

Debdatta Dobe

Debdatta Dobe