When the prevailing political and socioeconomic conditions in a state magnify rather than mitigate the impact of natural phenomena, food crises can be particularly severe, frequent, and even persistent without external help. A range of factors may create unfavourable conditions for food production—including climatic extremes, environmental degradation, labour or supply chain disruptions, conflicts, economic sanctions, resource limitation, or even health shocks due to epidemics. But systemic problems such as improper incentivisation, poor markets and export-import policies, inadequate technological inputs, and unsustainable practices can create food crises without a negative influence of natural phenomena.
This situation is exemplified by the food production crises that have repeatedly hit the state of North Korea. For a start, the current food grain shortage is a whopping
1.35 million tons. Similar shortages in the decade of the 1990s had created
famines and the current situation is not any better. There are many countries in the world that do not produce enough food grains to meet the calorific demand of their populations. However, a global surplus of food grain production has ensured that such countries have access to markets to meet their needs. North Korea, however, is an authoritarian, secretive, and closed nation, which compounded with its military belligerence, has left it isolated and distrusted in the global community. A series of economic and trade sanctions has meant that North Korea does not have access to global markets and its few trading partners are also encumbered by economic sanctions in trading with it. North Korea’s grain production stood at
4.64 million tons in 2019 and dropped marginally to 4.4 million tons last year, when the requirement is
about 6 million tons annually to meet the demands of its population. Many essential goods, including medicines, have become scarce, as the pandemic has forced North Korea to
close its border with China, its only major trading partner.
Being an isolated and tightly controlled
command economy, the
“tense” food situation is understood to have been brought about by
extensive flooding, the
coronavirus pandemic, and international sanctions by the US and the UN due to its nuclear weapons programme. The regime’s priority in making North Korea a
defense economy has overshadowed development and food production, while allocating precious resources to the military industrial complex, and bringing down living standards drastically. Such suffering of the large section of the populace can only be contained by state oppression and denial of basic human rights. This only further diminishes the ability of the North Korean society to address the food crises.
The regime’s priority in making North Korea a defense economy has overshadowed development and food production, while allocating precious resources to the military industrial complex, and bringing down living standards drastically. Such suffering of the large section of the populace can only be contained by state oppression and denial of basic human rights.
Meanwhile, a series of natural calamities have only added to the suffering. A
typhoon last year may have dented food grain production by
about 860,000 tons, equivalent to
almost two months of food grain requirement in what was already a situation of scarcity. The estimated food deficit of about 1 million metric tons last year meant that the average North Korean was consuming
about 445 calories lesser per day than the 2,100-calorie-diet recommended by the United Nations. Raising production by 20-30 percent for a poorly performing agriculture appears well within reach, provided that the political and socioeconomic conditions are favourable. The challenge of achieving
SDG 2 and its targets of ending hunger, achieving food security and improving nutrition and promoting sustainable agriculture may be achievable for this small nation, if the political situation is conducive for North Korea to be integrated in the global community of trading nations. And if the country opens itself to external know-how, technological inputs, and best practices.
However, the current situation in North Korea is far from what is needed. According to
FAO and CELAC (2020) “A person is food-insecure when they lack physical, social, and economic access to enough safe and nutritious food to meet their nutritional needs and food preferences and lead an active and healthy life.”
Insufficient agricultural production and land, non-availability of inputs, machinery and fuel, poor infrastructure, continuous mono-cropping, and limited capacity to cope with frequent climate-induced disasters have resulted in
chronic food insecurity and malnutrition for as large as 40 percent of its population who is in urgent need of assistance. Moreover, continuous mono-cropping and poor yields, year after year, have created a gap in agricultural production and food needs to the tune of 1 million tons each year. To make matters worse, the crisis is coupled with sky-rocketing prices of essential commodities making them unaffordable and inaccessible. The situation resonates well with Amartya Sen's entitlement approach, that diverts the attention away from
food availability as the main driver of food crisis to the issue of access to food.
Entitlement refers to “the set of alternative commodity bundles that a person can command in a society using the totality of right and opportunities that he or she faces”. Famines mostly occur when people experience a dramatic reduction in their 'entitlements' that may or may not necessarily be dependent on the extent of crop failure.
Famines mostly occur when people experience a dramatic reduction in their 'entitlements' that may or may not necessarily be dependent on the extent of crop failure.
However, in reality the problem of food security is a complex issue not just confined to access but is largely driven by political and policy issues that government conducts. In the words of
Bob Currie “people's food security is dependent both on the availability of food; and on people's command over that food, which is frequently a function of their purchasing power.” Currie further states that the issue of patterns of distribution of food is equally important to the concept of food security. Famines and food insecurity are
political crises as much as they are economic shocks.
Meeting the food demand of the growing population, and improving
nutritional outcomes will require North Korea to transition towards sustainable food systems and diversification. Adopting sustainable agriculture production techniques that can minimise the climate and environmental impacts and increase the resilience of food systems to shocks/uncertainties are critical to ensure stability of supply. Finally, in the backdrop of sanctions, fuel restrictions, and lack of modern machinery and equipment, it is in the best interest of North Korea to seek substantial
food provision through aid and ease the rigidity of border controls. What will remain, however, crucial to observe is how such aid is distributed.
The views expressed above belong to the author(s). ORF research and analyses now available on Telegram! Click here to access our curated content — blogs, longforms and interviews.
PREV
